Executive Education – Is it really all about the name?
January 22, 2013 1 Comment
I was talking with a couple of fellow L&D folk the other day about programs such as those offered by the Harvard Business School and the University of Queensland Executive Business School and what it was that made executive education such a lucrative and high end business and what it was that people actually got from attending one of the prestigious schools of excellence.
After the conversation I was left wondering whether in essence Executive Education is far less about learning things and far more about creating networks and being able to put a prestigious program on your resume. Now I know that this sounds may sound cynical, but it is not actually meant to be. We are generally talking here about people with wide experience, already with high level qualifications, for whom learning has, at least in my experience become incrimental, a good idea, piece of knowledge, or a new framework, which extends their mindset and model fo the world, rather than the rapid expansion of knowledge and skills we tend to find with earlier career education.
Given that this is the case it does seem to be the case, it does seem that the networking aspect of these programs is at least as important as the education one. But what makes certain programs better therefore, is the quality of the participants just as important as the quality of the facilitators? If this is the case then are what we really paying for the ability to network and ‘work’ with individuals with whom we may not have been able to in any other setting.
I would be interested in other peoples opinions.