April 10, 2017 Leave a comment
Rod Camm wrote a really interesting piece for his ACPET National Monday Update this week, which really struck a chord with me, primarily because it is looking at the VET sector and trying to inject some facts into a discussion often held ransom to media outbursts and ideological positioning. I thought therefore today I might look at the facts that Rod outlined and perhaps some others to see if we can’t get a little less biased view of our sector.
The first, and I think one of the most important facts pointed out, is that there is only about 2500 providers in the VET sector, actively delivering training, not the 4-5000 which is an often quoted number and the enrolments with these providers range from 1 student to over 100,000 students. A lot has been made of high-flying corporate whiz kids, cashing in on the VET sector and making massive profits at the expense of everyone else The media, the various education unions and some politicians have had a field day promoting this view, often for their own ends. The truth is however that private providers have average student enrolments of 819 with the median number being much lower at 204. This is tiny in comparison to the 19,000 and 16,000 figures for TAFE. The overwhelming majority of private providers are not huge corporate monsters, whose only goal is to make as much profit as they possible can; with just under 1000 private providers have less that 100 students, the vast majority are simply small providers, providing awesome outcomes to their students and the industries they serve. I bet we will never see that little nugget from the news media or the deep left, who much prefer the sensationalism of corporate failures. As I said in my piece early last year non-public providers are an incredibly diverse lot.
There is another myth that has been perpetrated upon this sector or more specifically upon the non-public side of the sector and that is that business and industry trusts and is more satisfied with the public provision of training than with the private sector. You could wonder I think, when you read the news media and the various commentaries and interviews around it as to why there was even a a need for a non-public VET sector given the love which is espoused for the public providers. When we look at the data from NCVER however, we see a different picture; employers indicate 80.0% satisfaction with private providers, 83.6% with industry and professional associations and 66.1% with TAFE. 80% of employers are very satisfied with the training delivered by non-public providers.
Now please don’t think I am trying to badmouth or undermine TAFE here, I have always been, and will continue to be a strong supporter of a well-funded and healthy public provider system. The public providers have a tough job, constrained in ways the non-public side isn’t, funding, bureaucracy, student cohorts, and the needs and wants of governments, it is no wonder their satisfaction figures are lower. This doesn’t mean that they do not do as good a job as or produce outcomes equal to that of the non-public providers, it is just that when you are trying to keep so many, often competing stakeholders happy, you are never going to succeed in doing that.
On to some other stuff now, well some facts and figures, which Rod doesn’t mention, but which I think are worth commenting on, primarily costs, funding and VFH. Now I have covered all of these points in other articles before, however I think that they are all worth mentioning again in this context. The first is of course the issue of funding for TAFE, much has been made of the fact that TAFE needs to be better funded and interestingly in 2016 we saw a lot of people talking about the need for TAFE to receive at least 70% of the funding available for VET This of course stopped quite quickly when it was pointed out that the public providers received around 80% of the public funding available in the sector already. Now before you ask where this figure comes from, it comes from the actual budget papers of all of the state governments, who are the ones responsible for the funding of the TAFE sector. The bigger question, which I asked last year and never got an answer for is where did that figure come from in the first place?
The other point is this idea that training delivered through a private providers is far more expensive that training delivered through the public provider, in one case it was claimed by The Greens, that private provision cost as much as 7 times the cost of public provision. These claims are demonstrably incorrect as I explained in detail here. These sorts of claims are based in general of really poor interpretation of information by people who have little or no knowledge of the sector itself. They ignore facts such as, that under most of the entitlement funding models the subsidy if the same for all providers, so the amount of money being paid is the same no matter who delivers the training. Even when we roll VET fee Help figures into the whole mixture of other funding and models that are out there, we see that at the very outside non-public provision across all courses at all levels the cost of delivery of a qualification through a non-public providers is about the same as it is through a public provider with both, when it all comes out in the wash costing around $45,000 per enrollment. It is important to remember however that is figure is going to dropped substantially with the introduction of the VSL scheme in its entirety from June this year. It will be interesting to see what happens to these figures and comparisons, when we get to look at them again at the end of the next financial year.
So why bring all of this up and talk through it? As Rod suggested it is important that we know the industry that we are working in. It is important that we know not just how to do the jobs that we do but the facts and figures which underpin that. Why? Because if we don’t then we might be tempted to believe some of the ill-informed, ideology fueled nonsense that comes to us through and is promoted by the media and other sources. Whether it is delivered by a TAFE, and industry association, a not for profit, an enterprise RTO or a private company, Vocational education is important to this countries future and decisions about it and how we can make it better need to be based on fact not opinion.
Anyway that’s just my opinion.