August 18, 2014 Leave a comment
As some of you who have been reading my blog for a while will be aware I have always been troubled by the seeming divide which exists between VET and University education in this country. This came up again recently when the very articulate Lauren Hollows asked this wonderful question on Linkedin; “Why does it have to be VET or HE?”. Quite early on in the life of this particular iteration of this blog, I presented a similar thought. Lauren’s post and the ensuing discussion prompted me to think a little more about this problem and why it is that there seems to be a divide between Vocational Training and University Education.
Lets jump in the time machine and go back to the dim past when I was in the final years of high school and looking at what I was going to do with myself post secondary school. The choices were pretty clear-cut back then, you left at year 10 and got a trade, you went on to year 12 and University or you just went and got a job. somewhere and to a large extent what we know now as the VET sector now was still a few years away. This I think is still some of the problem today, a lot of people not involved in the industry, who are now parents etc saw this divide, you went to TAFE to do a trade or you went to university and of course the unspoken thought was that the reason you left at year 10 and went and got a trade was that you weren’t going to get good enough results in 11 and 12 to get accepted into University. Now whether or not that was ever true, the mindset was there and still is, people still view VET as a choice you make when you can’t get into university.
Let’s fast forward to today though, this is not the case anymore and hasn’t been the case for some time now, sure VET education can be seen as an alternative education pathway, but it is also a supplementary or complimentary pathway. As a lot of the respondents to Lauren’s post said, myself included, a lot of people now have qualifications from both sectors, all of which provide them with different learnings and different skills and knowledge. So why then do we still hear comments like “I have a degree why would I was my time getting a Certificate IV/diploma?” We hear them because I think we have failed, all of us, the Government, the peak bodies, the providers to truly explain the post secondary education system in this country to people, and to explain it to people in such a way that makes sense to them and shows them the value of education regardless of what ‘sector’ that education comes from.
We have a single framework in this country for qualifications and we have had it since 1995. The Australian Qualifications Framework outlines who the whole system works and what each level from Level 1 (Certificate I) to Level 10 (Doctoral Degrees) work and what the skills and knowledge at each level is. I would hazard a guess however that very very few parents and student and probably not a lot of teachers and guidance officers were terribly aware of the content of the AQF and even fewer would understand how the system works and what all of it means and there in lies the problem.
What we need to do in this country is to embark on an education process, a process designed to explain to people simply and easily how the system works. If we ever as a country truly want to have an engaged workforce built on ideals of lifelong learning, then we need to do this we need to this, we need to explain to people the choices that they have and how they fit together. If we don’t there will always be a divide between the various educational sectors in this country and that would be a crying shame.